Talk:Portal:Extensions directory
Alternative format to what's currently in the article
Link (by company) | Profile= name | Elements extended |
---|---|---|
Softimage XSI extensions | XSI |
|
Companyname Product extensions | ABC |
|
Comparisons
Current article format:
- Pro: If there are a lot of companies registering extensions, will make it easier to find extensions by each of the different categories.
- Con: Same link appears in multiple places, so takes longer to insert a new one and harder to maintain.
Table shown above:
- Pro: Link in only one place, so faster and easier to insert new one and to maintain list
- Con: Table is arranged only by company name, so if there are a lot of companies with extensions, it's harder to view the list of profile names and of extensions by element.
Votes and comments
Which do you prefer, and why??
- Current article format (3 separate sections)
- Because blah. signherewithfourtildes
- Format shown above
- Because blah. signherewithfourtildes
Elf 19:00, 12 May 2007 (PDT)