Talk:Portal:Extensions directory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
alternative format with place to vote |
switching talk & article formats |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Alternative format to what's currently in the article== | ==Alternative format to what's currently in the article== | ||
===Alternative strategy and instructions=== | |||
{| style="text-align:left; | ---- | ||
|- style="background-color:#eeeeee;" | {| style="text-align:left; width:100%; border:1px solid #666666;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" | ||
|- | |||
| style="background-color:#eeeeee;" | <big>'''Instructions for adding to this list'''</big> | |||
# Add a link for your company in the "Extensions by company" list (below). Format it as "''companyname productname'' extensions"; for example: | |||
#: [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
# Add the link also in the "Profile names" section by the name specified in <technique profile="''yourprofilename''">; for example: | |||
#: XSI; see [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
# Add the link also under each relevant element in "Extensions by COLLADA element". | |||
* | # Save this article. | ||
# Click one of your new links to create your article. Tips: | |||
#*Use [[Softimage XSI extensions]] as a model. | |||
*< | #*Put <nowiki>[[Category:Extensions]]</nowiki> at the end of the article. | ||
|} | |} | ||
====Extensions by company==== | |||
*[[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
*(add similar items in alpha order) | |||
====Extensions by profile name==== | |||
*XSI; see [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
====Extensions by COLLADA element==== | |||
* <camera> | |||
** [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
* <COLLADA> | |||
** [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
* <image> | |||
** [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
* <light> | |||
** [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
* <node> | |||
** [[Softimage XSI extensions]] | |||
---- | |||
===Comparisons=== | ===Comparisons=== | ||
Format shown above: | |||
* Pro: If there are a lot of companies registering extensions, will make it easier to find extensions by each of the different categories. | * Pro: If there are a lot of companies registering extensions, will make it easier to find extensions by each of the different categories. | ||
* Con: Same link appears in multiple places, so takes longer to insert a new one and harder to maintain. | * Con: Same link appears in multiple places, so takes longer to insert a new one and harder to maintain. | ||
Current article format: | |||
* Pro: Link in only one place, so faster and easier to insert new one and to maintain list | * Pro: Link in only one place, so faster and easier to insert new one and to maintain list | ||
* Con: Table is arranged only by company name, so if there are a lot of companies with extensions, it's harder to view the list of profile names and of extensions by element. | * Con: Table is arranged only by company name, so if there are a lot of companies with extensions, it's harder to view the list of profile names and of extensions by element. |
Revision as of 02:18, 13 May 2007
Alternative format to what's currently in the article
Alternative strategy and instructions
Instructions for adding to this list
|
Extensions by company
- Softimage XSI extensions
- (add similar items in alpha order)
Extensions by profile name
- XSI; see Softimage XSI extensions
Extensions by COLLADA element
- <camera>
- <COLLADA>
- <image>
- <light>
- <node>
Comparisons
Format shown above:
- Pro: If there are a lot of companies registering extensions, will make it easier to find extensions by each of the different categories.
- Con: Same link appears in multiple places, so takes longer to insert a new one and harder to maintain.
Current article format:
- Pro: Link in only one place, so faster and easier to insert new one and to maintain list
- Con: Table is arranged only by company name, so if there are a lot of companies with extensions, it's harder to view the list of profile names and of extensions by element.
Votes and comments
Which do you prefer, and why??
- Current article format (3 separate sections)
- Because blah. signherewithfourtildes
- Format shown above
- Because blah. signherewithfourtildes
Elf 19:00, 12 May 2007 (PDT)